Cease-Fire (Arab Style)
A Cease-fire is unacceptable, at this point in order for Israel to survive.
Iran and Syria (fronted by Hezbullah) should not be dictating "terms for a cease-fire.."
Olmert has finally woken up, read the POLLS IN ISRAEL, and realized that he is putting the future of Jews worldwide at risk.
Israel must emerge victorious.
A HUDNA is what the Arabs, (Iran & the UN want)
""What is being touted as a 'cease-fire' is something called a 'hudna.' A hudna [also known as a hudibiyya or khudaibiya] is a tactical cease-fire that allows the Arabs to rebuild their terrorist infrastructure in order to be more effective when the "cease-fire" is called off." -- "Cease-fire?" by Shira A. Drissman"
Unacceptable.
Plain and simple. The President of Iran is on a winning streak, he is killing our troops in Iraq (with the Mahdi Army).
He is financing Hamas.
He is financing and has been arming Hezbullah.
He is close to (or has) acquired nuclear weaponry.
The United States is succumbing to pressure from WHO?
France?
Europe?
Arabs?
The resolution does not reference past UN efforts that FAILED.
Resolutions 1559 and 1680.
Here is why Israel cannot agree to a HUDNA.
Here is what the current resolution before the UN Security Council, that ISRAEL MUST NEVER AGREE To - despite world condemnation..
1 - No reference to return of Israeli soldiers kidnapped, on Israel's territory.
2 - No "teeth" behind disarming Hezbullah
3 - No Chapter 7 clause (which allows UN forces to FIGHT & disarm, it allows for
just a continuation of the same, the resolution only contains chapter 6 which is what THE ARABS AND THE FRENCH CHANGED from Israel's insistence last week that it be Chapter 7 -- - which has allowed Hezbullah to amass weaponry on Israel's
northern border for the past 6 + years while UNIFL watched, and did nothing, and actually supported - and did not impede, report, or deter.
4 - Inclusion of Shebaa Farms into the equation. This would be disastrous worldwide
(not just for Israel) - that terrorist can inflict damage - then dictate the
terms to include - LAND THAT THE WORLD HAS REPEATEDLY SAID NOT IS NOT THEIRS?????
I'm mad.
I'm angry.
Rationality, and what is right and wrong seem to be turned upside down?
Am I wrong?
A Cease-fire is unacceptable, at this point in order for Israel to survive.
Iran and Syria (fronted by Hezbullah) should not be dictating "terms for a cease-fire.."
Olmert has finally woken up, read the POLLS IN ISRAEL, and realized that he is putting the future of Jews worldwide at risk.
Israel must emerge victorious.
A HUDNA is what the Arabs, (Iran & the UN want)
""What is being touted as a 'cease-fire' is something called a 'hudna.' A hudna [also known as a hudibiyya or khudaibiya] is a tactical cease-fire that allows the Arabs to rebuild their terrorist infrastructure in order to be more effective when the "cease-fire" is called off." -- "Cease-fire?" by Shira A. Drissman"
Unacceptable.
Plain and simple. The President of Iran is on a winning streak, he is killing our troops in Iraq (with the Mahdi Army).
He is financing Hamas.
He is financing and has been arming Hezbullah.
He is close to (or has) acquired nuclear weaponry.
The United States is succumbing to pressure from WHO?
France?
Europe?
Arabs?
The resolution does not reference past UN efforts that FAILED.
Resolutions 1559 and 1680.
Here is why Israel cannot agree to a HUDNA.
Here is what the current resolution before the UN Security Council, that ISRAEL MUST NEVER AGREE To - despite world condemnation..
1 - No reference to return of Israeli soldiers kidnapped, on Israel's territory.
2 - No "teeth" behind disarming Hezbullah
3 - No Chapter 7 clause (which allows UN forces to FIGHT & disarm, it allows for
just a continuation of the same, the resolution only contains chapter 6 which is what THE ARABS AND THE FRENCH CHANGED from Israel's insistence last week that it be Chapter 7 -- - which has allowed Hezbullah to amass weaponry on Israel's
northern border for the past 6 + years while UNIFL watched, and did nothing, and actually supported - and did not impede, report, or deter.
4 - Inclusion of Shebaa Farms into the equation. This would be disastrous worldwide
(not just for Israel) - that terrorist can inflict damage - then dictate the
terms to include - LAND THAT THE WORLD HAS REPEATEDLY SAID NOT IS NOT THEIRS?????
I'm mad.
I'm angry.
Rationality, and what is right and wrong seem to be turned upside down?
Am I wrong?
posted by Andy at 2:37 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home